01
One-off or recurring
Weekly or monthly rules, evaluated in your organization's own configured time zone. A one-off window covers a single planned deploy; a recurring rule covers something like a weekly Sunday-night maintenance cycle, set up once instead of having to be recreated by hand every single time it comes around. It's built to match how real maintenance actually happens, rather than assuming every window is a one-time affair. It's built around how maintenance actually gets scheduled in practice, not an idealized one-off case.
02
Real accuracy preserved
Checks keep running throughout the window — only alerts and uptime math are suppressed. That's the detail that makes maintenance windows genuinely useful rather than just a way to silence alerts: you still get a real recovery timestamp the moment the service comes back, which matters if the maintenance runs longer than planned. That's a deliberate design choice — silencing an alert should never mean silencing the truth about what actually happened. It's a small distinction that keeps the whole system honest without sacrificing anyone's sleep.
03
Incidents still tracked
Open/resolve history stays accurate for the record; just the outbound notification is dropped. If you ever need to look back and confirm exactly when a maintenance-window outage started and ended, that record is still there in full — it's only the page that would've gone to on-call that gets suppressed, not the underlying data. It's the kind of record you don't need until the one time you really do. It's the kind of detail that matters most exactly when you'd least expect to need it.